【Background】We compared the current status and prognosis between inpatients from emergency room and inpatients from ambulatory who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).
【Methods】We divided 481 patients who underwent PEG between 2005 and 2024 into two groups: inpatients from emergency room (group ER) and inpatients from ambulatory (group non-ER) at the Veritas Hospital. We retrospectively compared the following parameters between group ER and non-ER: age, gender, primary diseases, nutritional methods and conditions, PEG indication, PEG method, rate of admission from home, hospitalization period, discharge destination, mortality rate, survival rate, and the cause of death.
【Results】Gender (p=0.0441), rate of admission from home (p<0.0001), rate of admission from convalescent-type hospital (p<0.0001), cerebrovascular disease rate (p<0.0001), serum albumin levels (p=0.00112), total cholesterol levels (p=0.0029), white blood cell levels (p<0.001), dysphagia rate (p<0.001), anorexia rate (p<0.0001), modified introducer method (p<0.001), hospitalization period (p<0.0001), and interval from admission to PEG (p<0.0001) differed significantly between the two groups. The difference in survival rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.348). Respiratory diseases were the most common cause of death in both groups.
【Conclusion】In both groups, patients were almost discharged from our hospital to convalescent-type hospitals or nursing facilities, and in the ER group, gastrostomy was identified as a means to promote transfer to the convalescent-type hospitals or nursing facilities. It is important to find a way to facilitate early gastrostomy placement, swallowing training, and discharge to home.
View full abstract