This retrospective study was conducted to analyze the follow-up of pulpectomized teeth and infected teeth treated at Tamashima dental clinic and also factors relevant to the healing results. Of the 426 teeth in 256 patients, 300 had not been previously treated (213 vital teeth and 87 non-vital teeth with apical lesions) and 126 previously treated teeth had apical lesions. According to the strict standard, i.e. the treatment is considered “successful” if and only if an x-ray image shows sound periodontal space, otherwise considered “failure” regardless of the sign of improvement seen in the region—the overall success rate was limited to 60.8%. Among teeth that were endodontically treated for the first time, the success rate was 70% for the vital teeth and 56.3% for the non-vital teeth while that for the re-treated teeth was 48.4%. When teeth with signs of improvement were included in the category of “success”, the overall success rate was 73.2%. According to the assessment criteria of the guidelines of AAE (American Association of Endodontists), success rate (healed and healing included) was 94.1%. Factors relevant to successful treatment include sex, post-treatment period (in case of retreatment), size of enlargement, number of root canals involved, apical terminus location of the root canal filling, and dentist’s experience, while other factors such as number of treatments (or visits), number of days spent before the filling procedure, patient’s age at the time of treatment, were indicated as not relevant. It is difficult to draw any conclusion in comparison with outcomes at other clinics and institutions considering the differences in conditions and backgrounds, but nonetheless the gaps in the success rate between Tamashima dental clinic and universities and specialists’ clinics were worthy of attention. Factors contributing to the success rate might include quality of basic treatment and degree of adherence to the guidelines as well as the nature of medical insurance system in Japan.
View full abstract