Japanese Journal of Livestock Management
Online ISSN : 2433-0159
Print ISSN : 1342-1131
ISSN-L : 1342-1131
Volume 32, Issue 2
Displaying 1-8 of 8 articles from this issue
  • Article type: Cover
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages Cover1-
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (24K)
  • Article type: Cover
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages Cover2-
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (24K)
  • Article type: Appendix
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages App1-
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (38K)
  • Shusuke SATO, Naoki OKAMOTO
    Article type: Article
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages 43-52
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    To investigate animal welfare trends among the general public, we issued a questionnaire to 595 Japanese. There was a range of ages and jobs. People were asked if killing, acute ill-treatment, or chronic ill-treatment should be permitted for domestic animals or chickens, experimental animals and pet animals. One to five grade-points (the higher the points the more tolerable) were chosen in each of 38 inquiries. In addition to interpreting approval or disapproval for each inquiry, points were treated by principal component analysis and least-squares analysis. Killing and acute stress for eating or medical research were most tolerable. Ill-treatment for fun or with selfishness were most intolerable. First, second and third principle components were estimated as 'common sympathy to animals', 'tolerance to cruelty as fun', and 'intolerance to cruelty with weak economical reasons or selfishness', respectively. The effects of sex and age of respondents, animal categories in the inquiries, kinds of treatment, and rationality on scores were significant. Males were more tolerant than females. Respondents above 60 years old were more tolerant and those under 20 years old were less tolerant than other age groups. Respondents were more tolerant toward farm animals, experimental animals and pets, in that order. They were more tolerant of killing, chronic ill-treatment, acute ill-treatment and physical cutting such as debeaking, docking and so on in this order. Treatment with strong profitable rationale for humans were most acceptable. 72.1 % of respondents recommended rearing farm animals without physiological and psychological stress and said they would be prepared to pay a higher price to some degree. In conclusion, it is thought that animal welfare trends are not basically different between Japanese and Westerners, and they are affected by food culture, emotions toward special animals (culture on companion animals), and animal welfare movements. Jpn. J. Livest. Management, 32(2) : 43-52,1996. Received May 7,1996. Accepted July 5,1996.
    Download PDF (887K)
  • [in Japanese], [in Japanese], [in Japanese], [in Japanese], [in Japane ...
    Article type: Article
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages 53-60
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
  • Masakazu HIGASHIYAMA, Masahiko HIRATA
    Article type: Article
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages 61-68
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Behavior of Japanese Black heifers and steers grazing a bahiagrass pasture in the daytime (9-16 h) was investigated in terms of the spatial distribution of animals and the percentage grazing time (PGT). The spatial distribution was described as the distribution of the number of animals in a paddock, an alley and a resting area. The degree of aggregation of animals (O/E ratio) in the paddock and alley varied with the intake of supplementary feed (IS) and the meteorological factors. The IS had a negative effect on the O/E ratio in the paddock, and a positive effect on the O/E ratio in the alley. The PGT was described on a basis of the whole daytime grazing period and the one-hour periods in the whole period. The PGT during the whole daytime grazing period was expressed by a mathematical model using IS and air temperature as predictors. The PGT in the one-hour periods was analyzed by examining its frequency distribution and the relationship to the PGT in the whole period. The animals showed highest PGT with lowest variation in the period of 10-11 h. The PGT in the first one hour (9-10 h) was most highly correlated with that in the whole period. Implications of the behaviors to the system management were briefly discussed.
    Download PDF (680K)
  • [in Japanese]
    Article type: Article
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages 69-73
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (593K)
  • Article type: Appendix
    1996 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages 74-
    Published: October 11, 1996
    Released on J-STAGE: October 03, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Download PDF (163K)
feedback
Top