This paper addresses the issue of the nuclear stress assignment in sentences with the structure of
have +
object noun +
past participle. The sentence containing this structure can be semantically ambiguous; it may be causative or experiential. It has been widely believed that the distinction between the two interpretations can be made by the position of the nuclear stress and that
have is stressed when the sentence is causative while the past participle is stressed when the sentence is experiential. To the best of my knowledge, no previous research has discussed the alleged statement except for Kato (1983, 1989), who points out that the statement is not confirmed by evidence. To reveal the empirical fact about the nuclear stress assignment in this structure, I conducted an experiment where nine native English speakers read aloud a pair of invented sentences slowly. The F
0 values of
have, the object noun, and the past participle were measured to judge which of the three items carried the highest F
0. The results indicate that the object noun carried the highest F
0 in both sentences. The paper also discusses three pedagogical implications.
View full abstract