Agreement about the terminology and descriptions of fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns (
nomenclature) is now well established, largely based on the report of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) workshop of 1997, but consensus on FHR interpretation and management has been extraordinarily difficult to achieve in US obstetrics.
Interpretation deals with the significance for the fetus in terms of risk of potentially damaging metabolic acidemia. It is also now understood that part of this interpretation is recognizing or projecting the probability of a pattern of lower risk of acidemia evolving into one with a higher risk so that timely intervention can occur.
Management means how the obstetrical team actually responds to a FHR pattern to minimize fetal metabolic acidemia without excessive operative or other interventions.
Many professional bodies and individuals, particularly overseas, have classified FHR patterns and recommended management approaches. For various reasons none of these guidelines has achieved widespread international adoption.
Evidence is accumulating that a 5-tier system does relate to degrees of acidemia and fetal damage and, if appropriately rule based, can improve consistency in interpretation among providers. There is also emerging evidence that if taught and accepted hospital-wide, such an approach can reduce newborn metabolic acidemia without increased obstetrical intervention.
An obvious solution is for professional associations to set up a framework that conforms to the currently available data (admittedly limited), which can be tested for effectiveness. The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology has done this with 5 tiers on a national level and is expecting validation (or the opposite) to emerge from subsequent studies.
View full abstract