It is important to grasp ground motion distributions right after a major earthquake. Ground motion is very sensitive to subsurface structure, but because seismic stations are sparsely distributed, it is necessary to estimate ground motion distributions at sites with no stations from subsurface structure data at those sites and ground motions data recorded only at surrounding stations. In this study, we investigated relationship between ground motion and subsurface structure to estimate ground motion distribution applying corrections according to the subsurface structure differences. Maximum velocity responses with a period of 3 s or longer were correlated with the first natural period of the deep subsurface structure, but maximum velocity responses with a shorter period correlated more strongly with the average S-wave velocity in the upper 30 m (AVS30) than with the first natural period. However, the ratios of maximum velocity responses at one station to those at a nearby station often differed for different earthquakes, indicating that there is limitation in estimating the ratios of maximum velocity responses only from the subsurface structures. Moreover, we did not detect any notable correlations between the subsurface structures and the durations of the velocity responses. Although these results were obtained by using relative velocity responses, similar results were obtained when pseudo-velocity responses were used.
We examined the standard gas scales and the stability of methane (CH4) standard gases that have been used for atmospheric measurements at the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) since 2000. Calibration of the JMA standards at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) using the NOAA04 gravimetric scale, which is the accepted World Meteorological Organization (WMO) CH4 mole fraction scale, showed that CH4 mole fractions in the NOAA04 scale differ by +1.3 to −4.5 nmol mol−1 from those in the gravimetric scale in use at JMA. We established a linear relationship between the differences, which can be used for conversion between the two scales. Stability tests showed significant drift of −1 nmol mol−1 yr−1 for the mole fractions of two of the standard gases tested; all other standards were shown to be stable. Experiments comparing the results obtained for standards used at JMA and the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) between 2000 and 2014 verified the conversion to the WMO scale and the drift correction used. The Inter-Comparison Experiments for Greenhouse Gases Observation (iceGGO) program in Japan can provide a useful means of validating the MRI/JMA CH4 scale and comparing it with other gravimetric scales used in Japan.
April 26, 2016 Due to the maintenance of online payment system, article purchase with credit card will be unavailable as following schedule. If you may encounter the maintenance difficulties, please try again after the maintenance is completed. Thanks for your kind cooperation. Details
May 01, 2015 Please note the "spoofing mail" that pretends to be J-STAGE.