Dysphagia occurs in various diseases and constitutes a major concern in patients with psychiatric disorders. The Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) comprises 24 clinical parameters designed to identify swallowing disorders. One item in MASA, the “gag reflex”, involves an unpleasant stimulus, which means that it is often omitted when the test is administered. The aims of this study were to determine the presence/absence of dysphagia in patients with psychiatric disorders using the MASA and determine its diagnostic accuracy when the gag reflex item was excluded in patients with psychiatric disorders. The study participants comprised patients admitted to a hospital psychiatric ward in whom dysphagia had been suspected based on oral intake status. The following items were determined: age, total MASA score (23 out of 24 items, giving a score out of 195 points), body mass index score, milligram equivalents of chlorpromazine, and the Food Intake Level Scale score. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of swallowing problems as assessed by videoendoscopic or videofluoroscopic examination. The scores for each item investigated in the MASA, including the total score, were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was carried out to determine the optimum cut-off value. The total MASA score, which excluded the “gag reflex” item, was lower in the problematic swallowing group than in the non-problematic swallowing group. The MASA scores for cooperation, respiratory, dysphasia, tongue coordination, oral preparation, pharyngeal phase, and pharyngeal response tended to be lower in the problematic swallowing group. Furthermore, an optimum cut-off value of 169 points (sensitivity, 0.92; specificity, 0.68; likelihood ratio, 2.84) was identified. These results indicate that the cut-off MASA score is effective in screening for dysphagia, even when the “gag reflex” item is excluded.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of combining mechanical (ultrasonic) and chemical cleaning (using denture cleaners) on the surface roughness of silicone or acrylic soft relining materials. The silicone soft relining material with the lowest Shore A hardness and a acrylic soft relining material routinely used in Japan were selected. Four groups were established based on type of treatment: immersion in water (W); ultrasonic cleaning in tap water (U); ultrasonic cleaning in a hypochlorous acid denture cleanser (HU); or ultrasonic cleaning in an acidic denture cleanser (AU). Following the tests, surface roughness was determined as the arithmetic mean height of the surface (Sa) and maximum height (Sz). Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction for a multiple comparison. No significant difference was observed in the Sa or Sz of the silicone soft relining material between the 4 groups. Significant differences were observed in the Sa of the acrylic soft relining material between Groups W and HU (p=0.008) and between Groups W and AU (p=0.008), but no significant differences in the Sz among the 4 groups. Combining U with AU or U with HU yielded no increase in the surface roughness of the silicon soft relining material. The surface roughness of the acrylic soft relining material showed an increase, however, with the combination treatments used.

The aim of this randomized crossover trial was to clarify the effects of chewing gummy jelly containing a compound of decanoic acid, oligonol, methyl cellulose, and citral (DOMAC) on mental stress and autonomic nervous activity in facemask wearers. A placebo gummy jelly was used in conjunction with DOMAC. Eight healthy adults with no tooth loss (mean age: 35±5 yr) were included. The participants were required to chew one DOMAC or placebo gummy jelly for 5 min after wearing a facemask for 20 min in the laboratory, then the other gummy jelly after a washout period. Rate of change in salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA) as a marker of stress was compared between before and after chewing. Additionally, sympathetic and parasympathetic activity was compared at both time points. A significant difference was observed in the percentage change in salivary IgA from that at before wearing a facemask: 127±34% (mean±standard deviation) while wearing a facemask; 46±20% while chewing DOMAC gummies; and 47±26% while chewing placebo gummies (p<0.05). Parasympathetic nervous system activity was 971.2±1040.7 ms² at 20 min after facemask wearing; 295.0±253.0 ms² after DOMAC gummy chewing; and 1956.1±2798.0 ms² after chewing a placebo gummy jelly; with significant differences only being found between 20 min after facemask wearing and after DOMAC gummy chewing (p<0.05). Sympathetic nervous system activity was 1.80±1.83 at 20 min after facemask wearing; 4.06±3.33 after DOMAC gummy chewing; and 4.95±7.02 after chewing a placebo gummy jelly; with significant differences only being found between 20 min after facemask wearing and after DOMAC gummy chewing. These results suggest that chewing gummy jellies containing DOMAC relieves stress caused by facemask wearing and activates sympathetic nervous system activity.

This study investigated decline in oral function in healthy young adults and compared it with that observed in an earlier studies employing older adults. The participants comprised 130 young healthy adults (mean age 24.1±2.9 yr), all with complete dentition. All participants underwent the oral hypofunction test established by the Japanese Society of Gerodontology, which evaluates oral hygiene, oral dryness, occlusal force, tongue-lip motor function (oral diadochokinetic rate; ODK), tongue pressure, and masticatory and swallowing function. The average value for and rate of hypofunction of each parameter were calculated. In healthy young adults, the scores were 28.9±17.1% for oral hygiene; 28.8±2.2 for oral dryness; 959.9±499.8 N for occlusal force; 7.0±0.8 times/sec for ODK /pa/, 7.6±0.8 times/sec for /ta/, and 6.9±0.9 times/sec for /ka/; 41.8±8.4 kPa for tongue pressure; 249.8±94.1 mg/dl for masticatory function; and 0.2±0.7 for swallowing function. No sign or symptom of change in oral function was observed at a high rate in young adults. Occlusal force, tongue-lip motor function, and tongue pressure showed a large difference in the rate of hypofunction between younger and older adults, however.