Alternatives to Animal Testing and Experimentation
Online ISSN : 2185-4726
Print ISSN : 1344-0411
ISSN-L : 1344-0411
Review
Alternatives to Animal Experiments: Serving in the Middle Ground
Michael Balls
Author information
JOURNALS FREE ACCESS

2005 Volume 11 Issue 1 Pages 4-14

Details
Abstract

The origins of the Three Rs (reduction, refinement, replacement) concept of alternatives to animal experiments are briefly reviewed, and examples are given of achievements and grounds for hope in the application of the concept, as well as of causes for concern. Attention is then focused on validation, the process whereby test methods are independently evaluated for the reliability and relevance for their stated purposes. Some problems which currently confront the validation process are identified, and a recent proposal that an analogous invalidation process is needed, is discussed. Finally, emphasis is placed on the need for active collaboration in the middle ground, to advance the welfare of both humans and animals.

Information related to the author
© 2005 Japanese Society for Alternative to Animal Experiments
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top