Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ)
Online ISSN : 1881-8153
Print ISSN : 1340-4202
ISSN-L : 1340-4202
THE AUTHORS' ANSWER TO DISCUSSION BY MR. HIROSHI UEHARA : Hiroshi UEHARA, J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, No.516, 181-182, Feb. 1999
Katsuki TAKIGUCHINoriyuki OGURAShaomei MU
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1999 Volume 64 Issue 516 Pages 183-184

Details
Abstract
The authors answer Mr. H. Uehara's questions as follows. The number of the answer corresponds to that of the question. 1. The authors used 2/Lx and 2/Ly as components of transformation matrix [A], because those components made a series of formulations simple. 2. The authors did not assume the shape of the yield,surface. The shape of the yield surface necessarily depended on the structural model, and was an octahedron. 3. It is a matter of course that different assumptions cause different physical characteristics. The authors compared the two rules to make clear the difference.
Content from these authors
© 1999 Architectural Institute of Japan
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top