Transactions of the Architectural Institute of Japan
Online ISSN : 2433-0027
Print ISSN : 0387-1185
ISSN-L : 0387-1185
OBSOLESCENCE TENDENCY OF BOOK AND PERIODICAL LITERATURE USE ACCORDING TO ACADEMIC FIELDS : A Research for Academic Library Planning No.3
KAICHIRO KURIHARASHINJI TOMIESADAO UEMATSUSHINICHIRO KADOYASHUZO KINOMASAAKI TOMURA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1981 Volume 299 Pages 115-125

Details
Abstract
In this paper we clarified obsolescnce tendencies of the literature of each academic field according to 100 divisions level of NDC classification, by estimating the past of the cited literature appeared in each paper and thesis since they were published. In this investigation we've divided the literature into four groupes such as books and periodicals of domestic and/or overseas publication. On the results, most striking points are as follows : 1) Qualitatively the use-ratio of the literature will climb up to the peak in a few years and then descend down exponentially year by year. These obsolescence tendencies are fairly different among the academic fields and/or literature groupes above-mentioned. 2) The literature on the fields of humanities and social sciences have tendencies to be used longer than those on the fields of sciences and technology. Book literature are used longer than periodical literature, and overseas literature are used longer than domestic ones. 3) Obsolescence tendencies of the literature rather well follow to the exponential curve described as the following formula; Y=A+BR^X X=past years of the cited literature appeared in each paper and thesis Y=cumulated percentage for total number of cited literature according to above-mentioned four groupes in each academic field A, B, and R=constant number We showed the value on the obsolescence tendencies of the literature which made clear relations between aging and cumulated percentage of use in each academic field by calculating from this formula. These values will be useful to academic library and research library planning.
Content from these authors
© 1981 Architectural Institute of Japan
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top