2026 Volume 18 Issue 2 Pages 144-155
Purpose: This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of initial conservative treatments for temporomandibular disorders (TMD), focusing on pain-related Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD).
Study Selection: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2000 and July 2021. Eligible studies included adults diagnosed with myalgia or arthralgia based on DC/TMD or RDC/TMD and evaluated the efficacy of conservative treatments. Twelve interventions, including stabilization splints, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), self-exercise, and placebo, were compared. Risk of bias was evaluated using Risk of Bias 2.0. MetaInsight software generated forest plots for direct comparisons, and network meta-analysis was performed standardized mean differenceing the netmeta package in R.
Results: A total of 24 RCTs comprising 1,336 participants were included in the analysis of pain outcomes, while 12 RCTs involving 614 participants evaluated maximal mouth opening (MMO). LLLT (SMD: −2.12; 95% CI: −3.18, −1.06), self-exercise (SMD: −1.51; 95% CI: −2.82, −0.2), and stabilization appliance (St-A) (SMD: −1.16; 95% CI: −2.02, −0.29) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain. For MMO, self-exercise (SMD: 0.71; 95% CI: −0.58, 2.01), St-A (SMD: 0.65; 95% CI: −0.09, 1.39), and LLLT (SMD: 0.63; 95% CI: −0.34, 1.6) showed promising effects. However, the certainty of evidence across outcomes was rated as very low due to methodological limitations and heterogeneity among studies.
Conclusions: Self-exercise, St-A, and low-level laser therapy show potential as effective conservative treatments in the early management of TMD. Nonetheless, the low certainty of evidence highlights the need for high-quality RCTs with standardized outcomes to strengthen clinical guidelines.