Comparing and Contrasting Guidelines for the Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Abstract

Introduction: The Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) recently published new guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS). There are two other guideline documents, the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders Sarcoidosis Organ (WASOG) Assessment Instrument created in 1999 and updated in 2014. Also, in 2014, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) published their international guideline document. As co-chair of the HRS document I have been invited to compare and contrast the management aspects of the HRS guidelines with the new JCS document.

Comments: (i) The HRS document recommended a stepwise approach to VT management and the JCS document is somewhat similar; but with some key differences. (ii) The HRS statement suggested that an ICD for CS patients with an indication for a pacemaker “can be useful”. The JCS document take a similar position although with some additional criteria related to National Health Institute Coverage guidelines. (iii) Both HRS and the JCS documents agree that ICDs are recommended in patients with general guideline indications for primary prevention (i.e. LVEF less than 35%). However which additional patients should be considered for ICDs is controversial. The 2016 JCS document is broadly similar, with the major exception that it is recommended that all patients with LVEF 35–50% should have an EP study.

Conclusion: The Japanese have been leaders in many aspects of CS including in guideline development. It is clear that the future of CS management is bright, with increasing international collaborations and also multiple efforts underway to obtain higher quality data to inform future guidelines.