Annals of Vascular Diseases
Online ISSN : 1881-6428
Print ISSN : 1881-641X
ISSN-L : 1881-641X
Review Articles
Does Patency Matter in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization?
Frederic BaumannErnst GroechenigNicolas Diehm
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2014 Volume 7 Issue 1 Pages 11-16

Details
Abstract
Restenosis is the major drawback in patients undergoing tibial angioplasty. In contrast to earlier observations, tibial patency was shown to impact on clinical outcomes in current randomized trials and is thus attributed more importance. Accordingly, intentions to reduce tibial restenosis have been intensified. Both drug-eluting balloons (DEB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) were shown to reduce tibial restenosis when compared with its plain counterparts. However, both endovascular technologies have its limitations for tibial arterial application. While DEB technology may not address elastic recoil, a pathophysiological mechanism frequently observed in tibial arteries and a significant contributor to restenosis, currently available DES do not fully address tibial arterial lesion morphology. Purpose of the present manuscript is to outline the problem and the incidence of tibial arterial restenosis, its importance on clinical outcomes and to provide an overview on technical developments aimed at its prevention.
Content from these authors
© 2014 Annals of Vascular Diseases

この記事はクリエイティブ・コモンズ [表示 - 非営利 - 継承 4.0 国際]ライセンスの下に提供されています。
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.ja
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top