Abstract
It is very difficult to prove something intangible, such as a thinking model or thinking system . In such a case, the only way to show the effectiveness of the model is to give examples as many as possible. Therefore, in this study, we take up the “e-Cycle Model” as a trial-and-error thinking model and examine past examples. Examine whether the thinking patterns of the model actually worked to achieve the goal. 7 past cases are applied to a matrix of models and thinking simulations are performed. After verifying the results focusing on “ e-Cycle Model”, we attempted to compare the U-theory with the entire “Process Model”.