Abstract
Jacoby, Shimizu, Daniels & Rhodes (2005) showed that the foil which was presented with the item having been processed deeply at the study phase was recognized at the recognition test better than the foil which was presented with the item having been processed shallowly at the study phase. This result was explained by Source-constrained retrieval (the self-initiated use of information to constrain what comes to mind from particular source during retrieval). It stimulated reinstatement of processing mode at study phase. Cho & Fujita (2011) was research with action sentence to confirm the generalizability, but didn’t replicate this phenomenon. They thought the result attributed to image generated from action sentence at study phase. This research intended to confirm the generalizability by using phonological process which didn’t need to produce the image form action phase. showed range in application of source constrained retrieval.
