抄録
The application of micro simulation and analytical software has contributed significantly to the development of new and existing transport systems. However, it seems that the successfulness of the software could be different when used in different countries, particularly when the software is newly developed. It is due to the different of local conditions. A study has been undertaken in investigating this issue. Two signalized intersection located in different countries, in this case, Adelaide in South Australia and Padang in West Sumatra-Indonesia, have been used as cases in modeling and analyzing by using CUBE Dynasim and aaSIDRA. It resulted in some interested findings. For instance, CUBE Dynasim tends to generate the same output as aaSIDRA and match with the real data for intersection located in Adelaide. However, it is different for another intersection in Indonesia. The possible causes are related to the local infrastructure and travel behavior conditions and the simulation factors used by CUBE Dynasim.
