緻密な作品リストの構築―複数雑誌におけるミューディーズ広告の分析を通して―

抄録

This study examines Mudie’s Select Library’s advertising strategies in 1860 across six weekly magazines: the Athenaeum, the Saturday Review, the Spectator, the Critic, the Literary Gazette, and the Examiner. While previous research has focused mainly on surviving catalogues, this paper highlights the largely overlooked magazine advertisements. Through comparative analysis of small lists, full-page ads, and surplus book lists, it reveals that Mudie’s, in pursuit of maximum advertising effect, did not simply reproduce identical content across publications, even on the same day. Instead, each magazine’s list was carefully adjusted — varying in the selection and arrangement of titles, and in the proportion of fiction and non-fiction — to appeal to different readerships. Notably, in the Saturday Review, Mudie’s slightly increased the proportion of fiction while maintaining its respectable image, possibly recognizing the magazine’s influence as a trusted guide for novel readers. In contrast, its advertisements in the Athenaeum placed somewhat greater emphasis on non-fiction. The study also contrasts Mudie’s dynamic approach with the repetitive advertising of competitors such as the United Libraries. These findings demonstrate that Mudie’s meticulous and adaptive advertising strategies played a crucial role in sustaining its prestige and expanding its readership during the Victorian era.