ENGLISH LINGUISTICS
Online ISSN : 1884-3107
Print ISSN : 0918-3701
ISSN-L : 0918-3701
ON A CERTAIN NOMINAL USE OF BECAUSE-CLAUSES: JUST BECAUSE BECAUSE-CLAUSES CAN SUBSTITUTE FOR THAT-CLAUSES DOES NOT MEAN THAT THIS IS ALWAYS POSSIBLE
YUKIO HIROSE
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1991 Volume 8 Pages 16-33

Details
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the grammatical construction exemplified by the sentence used as the subtitle, Just because because-clauses can substitute for that-clauses does not mean that this is always possible, where the because-clause is used as a nominal clause. It is shown that, syntactically, this construction derives from the blending of a construction with a that-clause as subject and one with an adverbial because-clause, and that, semantically, the construction is used to deny the inferential process of drawing a certain conclusion from a certain factual premise and to express some doubt about the validity of the conclusion as well. Through a close investigation of this particular construction and some related matters, it is suggested that the syntax of a grammatical construction is constrained in such a way that the construction is used for exactly the purpose it is expected to serve.
Content from these authors
© The English Linguistic Society of Japan
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top