Bulletin of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
Online ISSN : 2189-9363
Print ISSN : 0916-4405
ISSN-L : 0916-4405
Residual disturbances in soil physicochemical properties following scarification in regenerated birch forests in Hokkaido, northern Japan.
Eriko ITO Toru HASHIMOTOShuhei AIZAWANaoyuki FURUYASatoshi ISHIBASHI
Author information
RESEARCH REPORT / TECHNICAL REPORT OPEN ACCESS

2019 Volume 18 Issue 3 Pages 301-310

Details
Abstract
Soil scarification is a natural regeneration practice that has been widely conducted during the late 1960s and 1990s as a low-cost birch reforestation technique on Hokkaido, the northernmost island of Japan. It has recently received renewed attention as a low-cost reforestation technique following a final cutting of fir plantation. Scarification practices inevitably bring soil disturbance, therefore sustainable forest management should be weighed against the loss of soil resources. To clarify the residual state of soil disturbance in scarified birch forest, we investigated the physicochemical properties of surface soils (depth: 0–5 cm) at 24 strip-like scarification-regenerated birch forests (15-41 years old) treated from the 1970s to the 1990s using a bulldozer with an attached rake. Soils from scarified belt showed significant decreases C and N contents and increase soil bulk density, but slightly decreases the C/N ratio. Lower C and N contents and higher bulk density were generally found in soils forming on non-volcanic materials. Moreover, with regard to the C contents and bulk densities, those differences in non-volcanic soils between scarified and non-scarified belts was significantly larger than those in volcanic soils. This study identified soil disturbance due to scarification in the scarified stands examined in this study (< 41 years old), in particular in area with non-volcanic materials. The findings can contribute to a better understanding of future scarification practices striking a balance between retaining soil resources and birch regeneration.
Content from these authors
© 2019 Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top