2017 Volume 151 Pages 1-35
This paper addresses special kinds of Japanese subordinate clauses which lack an explicit head predicate but are similar in interpretation to clauses headed by a suspensive form of suru ‘do’, iu ‘say’, or omou ‘think’. I discuss that these unheaded constructions are subject to certain syntactic and semantic constraints that do not apply to their headed counterparts, and develop a formal analysis within the framework of Sign-Based Construction Grammar, aiming to model these constraints without postulating a covert element in the place of the missing predicate.