GHM Open
Online ISSN : 2436-2956
Print ISSN : 2436-293X

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Do hilar clamping and renorrhaphy influence postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy?
Masaki NakamuraIbuki TsuruYoshiyuki ShigaShuji Kameyama
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: 2023.01012

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Preservation of renal function is an important goal of partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors. Several attempts to preserve postoperative renal function, including hilar control surgery and omission of renal cortical renorrhaphy, have been reported, but the influence of each procedure remains controversial. We conducted a literature review based on PubMed to summarize the current situation and clarify the influence of each procedure on postoperative renal function. Effects of hilar control, omitting renorrhaphy, and a combination of both on post-PN renal function were reviewed. While hilar clamping does not influence postoperative renal function, cortical renorrhaphy tends to deteriorate. Parenchymal ischemia/reperfusion by hilar clamping leads to acute kidney injury through production of radical oxygen species. Recent randomized controlled studies, however, showed no differences in the postoperative renal function between on- and off-clamp laparoscopic PN. Finally, the effects of soft coagulation on renal parenchymal denaturation and postoperative renal function were reviewed. Although soft coagulation can lead to denaturation and necrosis of the renal parenchyma, the shortened warm ischemic time might positively affect postoperative renal function. In conclusion, off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy PN is feasible and safe for small renal tumors. Renorrhaphy, but not hilar clamping, tends to worsen postoperative renal function.

著者関連情報
© 2024 National Center for Global Health and Medicine
feedback
Top