International Heart Journal
Online ISSN : 1349-3299
Print ISSN : 1349-2365
ISSN-L : 1349-2365
Clinical Studies
Focalized Contractile Impairment at Hypertrophied Myocardium Proven in Consideration of Wall Stress in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Tadashi YamazakiJun-ichi SuzukiRyoichi ShimamotoTaeko TsujiYuki OhmotoTeruhiko Toyo-okaMasao OmataKuni OhtomoRyozo Nagai
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2006 Volume 47 Issue 2 Pages 247-258

Details
Abstract
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) a hyperkinetic state is sometimes observed in spite of impaired systolic function in the hypertrophied myocardium. The aim of the present study was to determine the mechanism of this paradox.
Seventeen patients with HCM and 10 normal subjects underwent cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to measure percent systolic wall thickening and percent fractional shortening. The ratio of systolic radial wall stress of the LV at the hypertrophied myocardium over that at the nonhypertrophied myocardium was evaluated to describe the focal advantageous condition for wall thickening.
The ratio was 0.66 ± 0.36 at the start of contraction and 0.78 ± 0.31 at early-systole, indicating consistently smaller radial wall stress at the hypertrophied myocardium. Although the condition for contraction was favorable (a ratio less than 1.00), percent systolic wall thickening at the hypertrophied myocardium (23.0 ± 11.8%) was smaller than that at the nonhypertrophied myocardium (70.5 ± 32.3%). Smaller end-diastolic dimension (HCM group; 45.2 ± 4.2 mm, reference group; 48.9 ± 4.1 mm, P = 0.04) with a statistically identical value of systolic decrease in intraventricular dimension (HCM group; 19.7 ± 3.9 mm, reference group; 18.9 ± 3.2 mm, P = 0.60) yielded high percent fractional shortening in patients with HCM (43.5 ± 7.6%).
Although contractile impairment was proven at the hypertrophied region with low radial wall stress in the HCM group, the smaller end-diastolic dimension in this group resulted in high percent fractional shortening.
Content from these authors
© 2006 by the International Heart Journal Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top