Initial and Long-Term Outcomes of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Calcified Lesions Compared With Bare-Metal Stents

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the initial and long-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with calcified lesions without performing rotational atherectomy.
The subjects were 79 consecutive lesions (38 in the SES group and 41 in the BMS group) which were confirmed to have superficially calcified lesions by intravascular ultrasound. In all lesions, the stent was implanted after predilatation with a balloon.
The patient characteristics were not different between the 2 groups.
All procedures were successfully performed in both groups. Vessel area was significantly smaller in the SES group than in the BMS group (11.01 ± 3.88 mm² versus 13.08 ± 3.49 mm², P < 0.005), as was the lumen area (5.41 ± 2.31mm² versus 6.48 ± 2.04 mm², P < 0.005). Minimum stent area was significantly smaller in the SES group than in the BMS group (5.61 ± 1.54 mm² versus 6.69 ± 1.74 mm², P < 0.01). In cases in whom angiographic follow-ups were performed, the late loss was significantly smaller in the SES group than in the BMS group (0.19 ± 0.49 mm versus 0.76 ± 0.48 mm, P < 0.001). The restenosis rate was significantly lower in the SES group than in the BMS group (8.8% versus 33.3%, P < 0.05) and the TLR rate tended to be lower in the SES group (7.9% versus 19.5%). Stent thrombosis was not observed in either group.
The results suggest that SES are more effective than BMS and can be used safely when treating calcified lesions if predilatation with a balloon is possible.