International Heart Journal
Online ISSN : 1349-3299
Print ISSN : 1349-2365
ISSN-L : 1349-2365
Clinical Studies
Developed Force of Papillary Muscle
What Index Correctly Indicates Contractile Capacity?
Danilo Sales BocaliniPaulo Jose Ferreira Tucci
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2009 Volume 50 Issue 5 Pages 643-652

Details
Abstract

We hypothesized that similar samples of the same normal heart should report similar contractile index values. We analyzed anterior (AP) and posterior (PP) papillary muscles (PM) of the same heart (n = 46), whose representation of force fulfills this premise calculating force (F: mN), tension (T: mN/mm2), and tension per milligram of myocardium (δ: mN/mm2/mg). In all analyses, F and +dF/dt as well as T and dT/dt values were higher in heavier PM. These differences disappeared for δ and dδ/dt. There was a significant and positive correlation for F and T as well as its derivative with myocardial mass. Myocardial depression (verapamil) of PP, in comparison to AP, was not recognized by F or T, but was identified when reported as δ. We conclude that the normalization of tension for papillary muscle mass is the most appropriate form for reporting intrinsic contractile capacity in PM since F and T depend on the myocardial mass participating in contraction.

Content from these authors
© 2009 by the International Heart Journal Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top