Abstract
Cardiogoniometry (CGM) has been proposed as a new diagnostic tool for coronary artery disease (CAD) in recent years. Although different studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of CGM in CAD diagnosis, no pooled analysis of its diagnostic accuracy has been performed so far. This study aimed to assess the value of CGM in diagnosing CAD in patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD).
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted on available literature until May 2018. Studies considered coronary angiography as the reference standard for CAD diagnosis and reported CGM diagnostic value parameters were included. No language and time restrictions for enrolling the studies were considered. Statistical analysis was performed using Meta-DiSc software.
The findings of the 10 studies published in 9 articles were enrolled in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled sensitivity was 71.7% (69.1 to 74.1; Cochrane Q = 39.5; P < 0.00001; I2 = 77.3%), and pooled specificity was 78.8% (76.3 to 81.1; Cochrane Q = 37.39; P < 0.00001; I2 = 75.9%). Regarding Egger's regression test (P = 0.32), there was no published bias in the studies.
It seems that CGM, as an easy-to-use and non-invasive modality, should be considered as a part of risk stratifying strategies for CAD in patients with SIHD, mainly in patients with contraindications for stress tests. However, further studies with a high quality of methodology are still needed to assess the diagnostic value of CGM for CAD in patients with suspected SIHD.
