Internal Medicine
Online ISSN : 1349-7235
Print ISSN : 0918-2918
ISSN-L : 0918-2918
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Predictors and Long-Term Prognostic Implications of Angiographic Slow/No-Flow during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Kazuyoshi SuenariNobuo ShiodeKinya ShirotaHiroshige IshiiKenji GotoAkinori SairakuShinsuke MikamiYukiko NakanoKazuaki Chayama
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2008 Volume 47 Issue 10 Pages 899-906

Details
Abstract

Objective In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), angiographic slow/no-flow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may lead to unfavorable outcomes. The aim of our study was to investigate the predictors and long-term prognosis of AMI patients with angiographic slow/no-flow.
Methods We evaluated 228 consecutive AMI patients with either normal flow (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3)(n=192) or slow/no-flow (≤TIMI-2)(n=36) based on cineangiograms performed during PCI.
Results Multivariable analysis demonstrated that a long lesion (≥10 mm)(odds ratio [OR], 3.514; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.505-8.206; p=0.004) and acute hyperglycemia (≥180 mg/dl)(OR, 3.011; 95% CI, 1.211-7.485; p=0.018) were significant and independent predictors of angiographic slow/no-flow. Further, we found that there was a high correlation (89%) for predicting angiographic slow/no-flow when the optimal cut-off values of lesion length (10.45 mm) and blood glucose levels on admission (187.5 mg/dl) were combined as identified by analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves. One-year mortality and incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were significantly higher in the slow/no-flow group than that in the normal flow group. Angiographic slow/no-flow was independently predictive of MACCE (hazard ratio [HR], 3.642; 95% CI, 1.208-10.980; p=0.022) and cardiac death (HR, 5.287; 95% CI, 1.155-24.204; p=0.032).
Conclusions Lesion length and blood glucose level on admission can be used to stratify AMI patients into a lower or higher risk for angiographic slow/no-flow before optimal coronary intervention. In addition, angiographic slow/no-flow predicts an adverse outcome in AMI patients.

Content from these authors
© 2008 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top