Internal Medicine
Online ISSN : 1349-7235
Print ISSN : 0918-2918
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Open-Label Randomized Multicenter Selection Study of Once Daily Antiretroviral Treatment Regimen Comparing Ritonavir-Boosted Atazanavir to Efavirenz with Fixed-Dose Abacavir and Lamivudine
Miwako HondaMichiyo IshisakaNaoki IshizukaSatoshi KimuraShinichi Okabehalf of Japanese Anti-HIV-1 QD Therapy Study Group
Author information
JOURNALS OPEN ACCESS

Volume 50 (2011) Issue 7 Pages 699-705

Details
Download PDF (287K) Contact us
Abstract

Background The side-effects of anti-retroviral drugs are different between Japanese and Caucasian patients. Severe central nerve system (CNS) side-effects to efavirenz and low rate of hypersensitivity against abacavir characterize the Japanese.
Objective The objective of this study was to select a once daily regimen for further non-inferior study comparing the virological efficacy and safety of the first line once daily antiretroviral treatment regimens in the current HIV/AIDS guideline.
Methods The study design was a randomized, open label, multicenter, selection study. One arm was treated with efavirenz and the other with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir. A fixed-dose lamivudine plus abacavir were used in both arms. The primary endpoint was virologic success (viral load less than 50 copies/mL) rate at 48 weeks. Patients were followed-up to 96 weeks with safety as the secondary endpoint. Clinicaltrials.Gov (NCT00280969) and the University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000000243).
Results A total of 71 participants were enrolled. Virologic success rates in both arms were similar at week 48 [efavirenz arm 28/36 (77.8%); atazanavir arm 27/35 (77.1%)], but were decreased at week 96 to 55.6% in the efavirenz arm and 68.8% in the atazanavir arm (p=0.33). At the 96-week follow-up, 52.8% of the EFV arm and 34.3% of the ATV/r arm reached total cholesterol more than 220 mg/dL and required treatment. None of the patients developed cardiovascular complications in this study by week 96.
Conclusion There was no significant difference in the efficacy of efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir combined with lamivudine plus abacavir at 48 weeks. The evaluation of safety was extended to 96 weeks, which also showed no significant difference in both arms.

Information related to the author
© 2011 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
Previous article Next article

Recently visited articles
feedback
Top