日本インターベンショナルラジオロジー学会雑誌
Online ISSN : 2185-6451
Print ISSN : 1340-4520
ISSN-L : 1340-4520
Ablationの現状と未来
肺腫瘍に対する凍結療法
井上 政則中塚 誠之屋代 英樹伊東 伸剛山内 良兼橋本 浩平川村 雅文小黒 草太栗林 幸夫
著者情報
ジャーナル 認証あり

2013 年 28 巻 2 号 p. 166-171

詳細
抄録
Since 2002, we have applied percutaneous cryoablation for lung tumors (PCLT) under intermittent CT fluoroscopic guidance. In this paper, we describe our experience of PCLT more than 100 cases with about 300 primary or secondary tumors. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. One-, 2- and 3-year local progression-free rates were 80.4%, 69.0% and 67.7%, respectively. Existence of a thick vessel (diameter ≥3mm) ≤3 mm from the edge of the tumor (P=.003) was assessed as an independent factor associated with local progression by multivariate analysis. Of 193 sessions pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and hemoptysis occurred after 119(61.7%), 136(70.5%), and 71(36.8%) sessions, respectively.
Of all cases with pneumothorax, 17.6% required chest tube insertion and 1.7% required pleurodesis. Delayed and recurrent pneumothorax occurred in 7.8% each. A greater number of cryoprobes was a significant predictor of pneumothorax (P<.001). Male sex (P=.047) and no history of ipsilateral surgery (P=.012) were predictors for the need for chest tube insertion, and no history of ipsilateral surgery (P=.021) was a predictor for delayed/recurrent pneumothorax. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 4 and 5 complications were not observed.
The biggest advantage compared with RFA is painlessness in PCLT. In addition, multiple cryoprobe activation is possible in PCLT. One of the drawbacks of PCLT is the difficulty of the PCLT procedure compared with RFA. PCLT could be performed minimally invasively with acceptable rates of local control.
著者関連情報
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top