抄録
Niklas Luhmann's theories of 'reduction of complexity' and 'autopoietic system' have been prosperous recently, and it is sometimes said that Luhmann's system theory exceeds Jurgen Habermas's communication-discourse theory. But isn't there any room for counterreplying Luhmann's theory? Can we make use of Pierre Bourdieu's (and Anthony Gidden's) perspectives? I tried seeking such possibilities. The key point is 'the perspective difference between the observer and the actor concerned.' (It can probably be said that so-called 'positivism' in particular depends on the observer's privilege.) It will be necessary for us to take the matter of the perspective of the actor concerned especially in the case of legal system. I regard 'Verrechtlichung' as one of the concrete situations concerning the problematique 'System and Discourse.' It is reexamined a little at the foot of the paper.
