Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
Online ISSN : 2188-5346
Print ISSN : 0915-8669
ISSN-L : 0915-8669
Case Reports
A case of invasive lobular carcinoma histiocytoid variant (histiocytoid breast carcinoma)
Aya ISEKISakae HATAKatsuyuki KATOHarumi KOBAYASHIToshiaki HARAYoshie SHIMOYAMAShigeo NAKAMURATadashi MATSUSHITA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2017 Volume 66 Issue 3 Pages 289-296

Details
Abstract

The invasive lobular carcinoma histiocytoid variant (histiocytoid breast carcinoma; HBC) is a rare variant that apparently shows apocrine differentiation. We report a case of HBC that exhibited a highly cellular smear pattern in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). The patient was a woman in her 80s. FNAC revealed numerous tumor cells in a mass in her left breast. The tumor cells were observed as loosely cohesive cellular clusters or scattered single cells. These cells with an abundant foamy cytoplasm and a low N/C ratio resembled histiocytes and occasionally showed an apocrine-like appearance with a rich granular cytoplasm. Histopathologically, she was diagnosed as having the invasive lobular carcinoma histiocytoid variant (HBC). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for p120, GCDFP-15, CD68, and androgen receptor, and negative for E-cadherin, adipophilin, ER, PgR, and HER2. The Ki-67 positivity rate was 2%, and p53 stained weakly (5–10%). Alcian blue diffusely stained the tumor cells. The diastase-resistant PAS reaction was positive in the prominent eosinophilic granular cytoplasm but was negative or partially positive in the slightly eosinophilic foamy cytoplasm, which was more strongly positive for GCDFP-15. HBC showed a close resemblance to pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma (PILC) in its smear pattern and mucin-positive cytoplasm, but the nuclear atypia, Ki-67 positivity rate, and HER2 and p53 expression levels were considered useful for distinguishing HBC from PILC. The apocrine features of HBC were incomplete in the sense that adipophilin was negative.

Content from these authors
© 2017 Japanese Association of Medical Technologists
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top