Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
Online ISSN : 2188-5346
Print ISSN : 0915-8669
ISSN-L : 0915-8669
Technical Articles
Comparison of serum mycophenolic acid concentrations measurement methods by particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, which is the recommended method for the measurement of mycophenolic acid
Chinami OYABUItsuko SATOKazuhiro YAMAMOTOIkuko YANOYuji NAKAMACHIJun SAEGUSA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2020 Volume 69 Issue 1 Pages 36-43

Details
Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a mycophenolic acid (MPA) prodrug, has been commonly used in immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation. Since the pharmacokinetics of MPA has a large interindividual variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is needed. MPA concentration has been measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT). However, the LC-MS/MS method is complicated and needs many hours; on the other hand, EMIT detects both MPA and its metabolites. In this study, we examined the performance of the particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) for the measurement of MPA in terms of its within-run and day-to-day run reproducibilities, linearity, and detection limits, and the effects of interfering substances, serum-separating agents, storage condition, as well as wide-range relationship with LC-MS/MS. PETINIA showed a satisfactory performance in terms of sensitivity, reproducibility, and specificity. In addition, serum-separating agents did not affect the concentration measurements, and the storage stability was equivalent to the data described in the attached document of the reagent. The correlation with the LC-MS/MS method was satisfactory (y = 1.18x − 0.09, r = 0.980, p < 0.01), but plasma samples more than 15 μg/mL MPA showed higher MPA concentrations in PETINIA. In conclusion, the clinical usefulness of PETINIA for the measurement of plasma MPA concentrations was suggested in the lower range; on the other hand, the higher plasma MPA concentrations measured by PETINIA should be carefully interpreted.

Content from these authors
© 2020 Japanese Association of Medical Technologists
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top