産業保健法学会誌 英文誌
Online ISSN : 2758-4755
Print ISSN : 2758-4771

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Policies to Address Psychosocial Health Risks at Work: A Narrative Review of Taiwan’s Experiences
Yawen CHENG
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: oa.23-006

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Psychosocial risks at work have been significant occupational health concerns in high-income countries. Yet, research on how psychosocial risks at work come to the forefront of public attention and prompt government policy responses remains limited. This study adopted a narrative review approach to examine the development of policies adopted in Taiwan to address psychosocial health risks at work during the process of turning from a middle-income country to a high-income country. Kingdon’s Multiple-Stream Model was applied to analyze the forming of the problem, policy and political streams.

The review indicated that work-related stress emerged as a policy problem in Taiwan through dynamic social processes that involved rapid information dissemination through the media, active campaign efforts of civil organizations and responsive actions of the labor authority. Policy streams concerning the choices of policy instruments were influenced not only by international experiences, particularly of Japan, but also by the preferences of domestic policy participants. As for the political stream, work stress problems ranked high in the political agenda during economic downturns and were intensified by political party competition. Medical case reports and findings of labor inspection investigations provided evidence for the formation of problem streams, while epidemiological evidence was consulted in forming regulations and guidelines for determining the work relatedness for compensation claims and identifying high-risk workers for targeted intervention.

By understanding the dynamics of the multiple streams, researchers and policy participants of latecomer countries may position themselves better for policy changes.

著者関連情報
© 2024 The Japan Association of Occupational Health Law
feedback
Top