Abstract
In clinical-engineer training courses, we conform to the training instruction guidelines (Japan Association for Clinical Engineers); however, as clinical training programs are provided in clinical practice, trainees tend to lose initiative. In particular, the number of cases of percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) varies depending on the medical institution, and thus all trainees do not necessarily observe clinical cases. This situation may further decrease the motivation of trainees. To improve this situation, we introduced “a simulation training program for PCPS implementation” and assessed the benefits of this program according to each trainee’s depth of understanding.
Seventy-seven students in our department enrolled in this course. To simulate clinical practice, each student played a role, such as medical doctor, nurse, or clinical engineer. After completion of the program, we conducted a questionnaire survey on each student’s depth of understanding.
The self-evaluation of the depth of understanding showed that 98% of the students gave themselves 7 or more points out of 10 (mean ± SD: 8.59 ± 1.95), suggesting that this new training program enhanced their motivation and resulted in better understanding.