抄録
Aim: No flow-limiting dissection after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions is considered as one of the endpoints, but it has not investigated the difference between each vessel dissection. This study aimed to clarify whether there is a difference between no dissection and type C dissection without flow-limiting dissection for 3 months by peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) based on duplex ultrasonography.
Methods: Between February 2020 and April 2021, 44 consecutive de novo FP diseases that underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) with DCB were enrolled in this study. 65.9% of the patients had intermittent claudication, and mean lesion lengths were 194±107 mm. The chronic total occlusion was 38.6%. After DCB treatment, vessel dissection pattern was categorized by angiography. The minimum lumen area (MLA) identified by intravascular ultrasound was serially evaluated with PSVRs at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months after EVT.
Result: All lesions were treated with DCB without provisional stents. The vessel dissection pattern after DCB treatment showed that types D, E, and F were not observed, 9% were no dissection, 27% were type A, 32% were type B, and 32% were type C. In all cases, the PSVR values of MLA site were less than 2.6 at 3 months, and there were no significant differences between no dissection and type C dissection.
Conclusion: Up to dissection pattern “C” is considered acceptable as one of the endpoints to determine the need for provisional stenting after DCB treatment.
