2024 Volume 19 Issue 6 Pages 1036
Upon further review of the article, the authors noticed errors in Figs. 9 and 10 that the authors would like to correct. The authors regret this error, and this error has now been corrected in the PDF version of the article.
Now reads
Fig. 9 Loss training value.(Written 0,06; 0,11; 0,16; 0,21; 0,26; 0,31; on the y-axis.) Fig. 10 Histogram of error percentage.(Written 1 m; 1,7 m; 2 m; 2,45 m on the x-axis.)
Should read
Fig. 9 Loss training value.(Should be 0.06; 0.11; 0.16; 0.21; 0.26; 0.31; on the y-axis.) Fig. 10 Histogram of error percentage.(Should be 1 m; 1.7 m; 2 m; 2.45 m on the x-axis.)
This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.