Journal of Epidemiology
Online ISSN : 1349-9092
Print ISSN : 0917-5040
ISSN-L : 0917-5040

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Economic Evaluation of Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy among Chinese Type 2 Diabetics: A Community-based Study in Kinmen, Taiwan
Tao-Hsin TungHui-Chuan ShihShih-Jen ChenPesus ChouChi-Ming LiuJorn-Hon Liu
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS Advance online publication

Article ID: JE2007439

Details
Abstract
Background: This community-based study conducted in Kinmen aimed to discover whether screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) among Chinese with type 2 diabetes was economically feasible and clinically effective.
Methods: A total of 971 community-dwelling adults previously diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 1991-1993 underwent DR screening in 1999-2002 by a panel of ophthalmologists, who used on-site indirect ophthalmoscopy and 45-degree color fundus retinal photographs. Economic evaluation included estimates for cost effectiveness and the cost utility of screening for DR.
Results: For each DR case, screening efficacy and utility decreased, while cost increased with the length of the screening interval. The cost per sight year gained in the annual screening, biennial screening, 3-year screening, 4-year screening, 5-year screening, and control groups were New Taiwan dollars (NT$) 20962, NT$ 24990, NT$ 30847, NT$ 37435, NT$ 44449, and NT$ 83411, respectively. The cost per quality-adjusted life year gained by the annual screening, biennial screening, 3-year screening, 4-year screening, 5-year screening, and control groups were NT$ 21924, NT$ 25319, NT$ 30098, NT$ 35106, NT$ 40037, and NT$ 61542, respectively. Threshold values indicate that the screening programs are highly sensitive to screening cost in the plausible range.
Conclusion: Screening for DR is both medically and economically worthwhile. Annual screening for DR among Chinese with type 2 diabetes should be conducted. Prevention programs aimed at improving eye care for patients with type 2 diabetes result in both substantial federal budgetary savings and highly cost-effective health care.
Content from these authors
© 2008 by Japan Epidemiological Association
feedback
Top