Journal of Epidemiology
Online ISSN : 1349-9092
Print ISSN : 0917-5040
ISSN-L : 0917-5040
Progress report of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Community-Based Cohort Study: Study profile of the repeated center-based survey during second period in Miyagi Prefecture
Atsushi HozawaKumi NakayaNaoki NakayaTomohiro NakamuraMana KogureRieko HatanakaIppei ChibaIkumi KannoJunichi SugawaraEiichi KodamaYohei HamanakaTomoko KobayashiAkira UrunoNaho TsuchiyaTakumi HirataAkira NaritaAkito TsuboiToru TamaharaAkihito OtsukiMaki GotoMakiko TairaRitsuko ShimizuKichiya SuzukiTaku ObaraMasahiro KikuyaHirohito MetokiMami IshikuroInaho DanjohSoichi OgishimaSatoshi NagaieNaoko MinegishiMasahiro HiratsukaKazuki KumadaIchiko NishijimaTakahiro NobukuniYumi Yamaguchi-KabataFuji NagamiShigeo KureNobuo FuseKengo KinoshitaYoko IzumiShinichi KuriyamaMasayuki Yamamoto
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS Advance online publication

Article ID: JE20230241

Details
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to report the basic profile of the Miyagi Prefecture part of a repeated center-based survey during the second period (2nd period survey) of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Community-Based Cohort Study (TMM CommCohort Study), as well as the participants’ characteristics based on their participation type in the baseline survey.

Methods: The 2nd period survey, conducted from June 2017 to March 2021, included participants of the TMM CommCohort Study (May 2013 to March 2016). In addition to the questionnaire, blood, urine, and physiological function tests were performed during the 2nd period survey. There were three main ways of participation in the baseline survey: Type 1, Type 1 additional, or Type 2 survey. The 2nd period survey was conducted in the same manner as the Type 2 survey, which was based on the community support center (CSC).

Results: In Miyagi Prefecture, 29,383 (57.7%) of 50,967 participants participated in the 2nd period survey. The participation rate among individuals who had visited the CSC was approximately 80%. Although some factors differed depending on the participation type in the baseline survey, the 2nd period survey respondents in the Type 1 and Type 2 survey groups at baseline had similar traits.

Conclusions: The 2nd period survey of the TMM CommCohort Study provided detailed follow-up information. Following up on the health conditions of the participants will clarify the long-term effects of disasters and contribute to personalized prevention.

Content from these authors
© 2024 Atsushi Hozawa et al.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top