jibi to rinsho
Online ISSN : 2185-1034
Print ISSN : 0447-7227
ISSN-L : 0447-7227
Evaluation of Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Lenampicillin in Acute Tonsillitis
In Comparison with Cefaclor by Double-blind Method
Shozo KAWAMURAIMO WATANABETakatsugu ITABASHIToshio UCHIDAMasashi WADAHiroshi WATANABEMikio TANAKATetsuo ISHIIMakiko KUKIMikiko TAKAYAMAHirosato MIYAKEAtsushi SHINKAWAYutaka SAKAMOTOToukou TATEHARAYasuko URAOYoshihisa KAWASAKIHirokazu SHIBUIYutaka FUJIMAKIShunkichi BABAHaruji KINOSHITAYoshito MORIKenji SUZUKITakeshi MARUOHaruo ITOYoshimasa SEKIYAHiromi IwoKenji WADANobuhito MUTOJun HONDOTsutomu HATANOKaoru SOYANOTsuyoshi TAKANOShigenobu IWATATadao NISHIMURAMikio YAGISAWAMASAO NAITOHisashi KUROYANAGIKensei NAITOMasaru NODATakehiro KOBAYASHIMasao TSUKIYAMATohru MATSUNAGAHitoshi OGINOYoshito OHYAYasuo WATANABESatoshi HASEGAWAHaruhiro HAYASHIMinoru ISHIDAShinji OHIRAHideji ARIGAHiroshi FURUKAWAKaoru OCHIAIMasayoshi OZAKIToshiyuki MIYOSHIYasuo HARADAKohji YAJINDaisuke CHIKUYEMasuhiro NODAMichinori KUROKAWATetsuo YOSHIOKATakeo YASHIKIMitsuru SATORyohzo YABUTAMasaru OHYAMAKenji KATSUTAShigeru FURUTAIchiro MORIYAMAIkuo OHNOKazuaki OGAWAYutaka HANAMUREKunihiko SAKAMOTOEtsuro OBATATsuneo TANAKAKoichi DEGUCHI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1985 Volume 31 Issue 4 Pages 825-846

Details
Abstract
A double blind study has been carried out for the effectiveness, safety and usefulness of Lenampicillin (LAPC, 250 mg, t. i. d.) for acute tonsillitis. 1. For all the rate of effectiveness (excellent+good) just evaluated by a physician in charge with LAPC group 91.1 % (82/90) and Cefaclor (CCL) group 83.9 % (78/93), and by Committee judgement with LAPC group 78.9 % (71/90) and CCL group 72.0 % (67/93), no significant difference was found despite LAPC group being in fact higher in effectiveness. 2. In the bacteriological effect, no significant difference was recognized with almost the same eradication rate between LAPC group 97.6 % and CCL group 98.8 %. 3. In regard to the safety, no significant difference in the cases of appearance of side effects has been recognized with LAPC group, 6 cases out of 128 (4.7 %), and CCL group, 6 cases out of 126 (4.8 96). 4. As for the usefulness, no significant difference was recognized with the rate of usefulness (markedly satisfactory +satisfactory), LAPC group 87.0 % (80/92) and CCL group 84.5 96 (82/97). From the results thus obtained above, the LAPC (250 mg, t. i. d.) can be considered as highly useful drug being capable of expecting the same result when compared with CCL (250 mg, t. i. d.) for the treatment of acute tonsillitis.
Content from these authors
© JIBI TO RINSHO KAI
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top