jibi to rinsho
Online ISSN : 2185-1034
Print ISSN : 0447-7227
ISSN-L : 0447-7227
Evaluation of Flomoxef (FMOX) in the treatment of purulent otitis media
A double-blind comparative clinical trial with Cefotiam (CTM)
Shunkichi BABAMitsuaki INAGAKITokuji UNNOFumi OHASHIMitsuhiro TANIDAOsamu YANAISatoshi NONAKAToshihiko KAMITOYoshiyuki ICHIKAWAHisakazu SUGIMORITomonori TAKASAKATakaharu BOKUSAWAShinji YOSHIDAEiji ARAISachiko TOMIOKAJunichi KANBAYASHISatomi ENDOYuichi NAKANOSugata TAKAHASHIIchiro FURUUCHIToshie SOGATetsuo TAKEDAYasuo TANAKAYoshihiro KOSEKIDaisuke NAGAETadao ASAIHiroki HAYATAShozo KAWAMURAHideki SAITOTakuya YAMAKAWAIsao WATANABEMasafumi NAKAGAWATakatsugu ITABASHIMasashi WADAYutaka FUJIMAKIHiroshi WATANABEYasuya NOMURAKen KITAMURAKenichi NIBUTetsuo SENBATetsuo ISHIIMikiko TAKAYAMANaomi TSUJITAYuko NAGASUEJyunko ISHIIYoichi ISHIZUKAMinoru TORIYAMAYukiko IINOYasuji TORIYAMAMasaki KATOMitsuya SUZUKIMasakazu NAKAMURAKeiichi ICHIMURAYasushi MURAKAMIToshio ISHIBASHIIsuzu KAWABATAMasaaki YAMANERyuichi OSANAIShigeo OGAWAShinjiro ONISHIKeiko KOBAYASHIHirosato MIYAKEAtsushi SHINKAWAMakoto SAKAINobuyuki KOMATSUEiki FURUYAHiroshi OGAWAMasakatsu KASAGIJunichi MATSUKAWASaneaki KANMutsumi NAKAYAMAKeisuke TAKEDATadaro NISHIMURAAkio SUZUKITakeshi MARUOHaruo ITOToru MATSUNAGAHideyo ASAIHiromitsu TAMAKISeijin KIMUMinoru ISHIDANaozo TAYATakashi MATSUNAGAToshiaki OKASAKAYoshiyuki KITAOKUYukikazu HYOYozo ORITAMakoto KAWADATadao WAKUTANIArihiro FUJINTaiji KATOYoshihisa ONAKAToru SEKITANITetsuyasu HIRATAYoshihiko OKINAKATetsuhiko INOKUMAKeiko KANESADAHaruo SAITOTadashi KIMURAGoro MOGIYuichi KURONOHaruo SATOAkiteru YUMISAKIHirofumi KATOITakemoto SHINIkuro MORIKAWAShun WATANABEMitsuru FURUKAWAKatsumi UEGAKITamotsu MORIMITSUFujihiko KASANOYuichiro ADACHIKazuaki SAKUKoji MAKINOAkitoshi HAYASHIMidori NAGAIIchiro MATSUMOTOTetsuya TONOMasaru OYAMAShigeru FURUTAEtsuro OBATARyuji KIYOTAKozo FUKAMISatoshi ONOHiromi YANOYasuichi OHORIHirofumi MATSUYAMAKoichi DEGUCHIMitsuyoshi NAKASHIMA
Author information
Keywords: Flomoxef (FMOX)
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1989 Volume 35 Issue 4 Pages 673-693

Details
Abstract
The clinical efficacy, safety, safety and usefulness of Flomoxef (FMOX) in treating suppurative otitis media (acute otitis media and acute exacerbation of chronic otitis media) were investigated by means of a double-blind comparative clinical trial using Cefotiam (CTM) as the control antibiotic. The total daily dosage for both antibiotics was 2 grams (potency), administered by intravenous injection in two 1 gram doses. Treatment was usually continued for seven consecutive days. The total number of patients in the study was 234.186 of these patients were used to analyze the clinical efficacy (94: FMOX analysis, 92 CTM analysis). 1. Committee analysis of the clinical efficacy of treatment for both acute and chronic forms of purulent otitis media showed efficacy rates of 58.5% for the FMOX group and 54.3% for the CTM group. Efficacy rates determined by the investigators' evaluations gave FMOX an efficacy of 68.1% and CTM, 59.8%. The differences in efficacy of the two drugs for both analyses were not statistically significant. For treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic suppurative otitis media, the committee rated FMOX to have a clinical efficacy of 57.5%, and CTM, 50.0%. The efficacy of FMOX was significantly higher (p=0.031). For cases of acute purulent otitis media, the committee rated the efficacy of FMOX to be 64.3% and CTM to be 90.0%. In these cases, the efficacy rate of CTM was significantly higher (p=0.032). 2. The bacterial eradication rates were not significantly different. Eradication of the causative microbes was 67.1% for the FMOX group and 61.4% in the CTM group. 3. Side effects developed in 7 Patients undergoing FMOX treatment, and in 4 patients undergoing CTM treatment. Abnormal laboratory test values were detected in 6 FMOX patients and 7 CTM patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the incidence of side effects or abnormal laboratory findings. On the basis of the above results, FMOX is concluded to be an antibiotic whose usefulness can be favorably compared to CTM in treating types of suppurative otitis media, including acute exacerbation of chronic suppurative otitis media.
Content from these authors
© JIBI TO RINSHO KAI
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top