A Japanese Language Version of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile

Chang-nian WEI; Hiroyuki YONEMITSU; Koichi HARADA; Takashi MIYAKITA; Shoko OMORI; Tatsuya MIYABAYASHI; Atsushi UEDA

doi:10.1265/jjh.54.597

日本語版健康増進ライフスタイルプロフイール

魏長年, 米満弘之, 原田幸一, 宮北隆志, 大森昭子, 宮林達也, 上田厚

著者情報

キーワード: 健康増進ライフスタイル, 調査票

ジャーナルフリー

2000 年 54 巻 4 号 p. 597-606

DOI https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.54.597

詳細

発行日: 2000/01/15 受付日: 1999/05/10 J-STAGE公開日: 2009/02/17 受理日: 1999/09/03 早期公開日: - 改訂日: -
訂正情報
訂正日: 2009/02/17 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文タイトル訂正内容: 訂正前 : 日本語版健康増進ライフスタイルプロフィール
訂正後 : 日本語版健康増進ライフスタイルプロフイール

訂正日: 2009/02/17 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文抄録訂正内容: Wrong : The development and initial psychometric evaluation of a Japanese version of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II) is described. The 52-item instrument was translated into Japanese and was found to be culturally relevant and reliable in a pilot study. The Japanese version was then administered to adiverse but predominantly Japanese group of 337 subjects residing in northern Japan. The Japanese version of the HPLP II was evaluated using factor analysis and reliability measurement. Six factors similar to those isolated previously during psychometric assessment of the English language version were extracted. Those six dimensions comprise the HPLP II subscales of: 1. Health responsibility, 2. Spiritual growth, 3. Physical activity, 4. Interpersonal relations, 5. Nutrition, and 6. Stress management. The alpha reliability coefficient for the total scale was 0.94 and the 2-week retest reliability was 0.91; the alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.87. The Japanese language version of the HPLP II appears to have sufficient validity and reliability for use by researchers who wish to describe the health-promoting components of lifestyle among the Japanese population and to explore differences and similarities in the health-promoting lifestyle of Japanese and American subjects or those of other ethnic groups. Further evaluations of measurement with different populations appears warranted. This instrument will enable researchers to investigate patterns and determinants of health-promoting lifestyle, as well as the effects of interventions to alter the lifestyle.
Right : The development and initial psychometric evaluation of a Japanese version of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II) is described. The 52-item instrument was translated into Japaneseand was found to be culturally relevant and reliable in a pilot study. The Japanese version was then administered to adiverse but predominantly Japanese group of 337 subjects residing in northern Japan. The Japanese version of the HPLP II was evaluated using factor analysis and reliability measurement. Six factors similar to those isolated previously during psychometric assessment of the English language version were extracted. Those six dimensions comprise the HPLP II subscales of: 1. Health responsibility, 2. Spiritual growth, 3. Physical activity, 4. Interpersonal relations, 5. Nutrition, and 6. Stress management. The alpha reliability coefficient for the total scale was 0.94 and the 2-week retest reliability was 0.91; the alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.87. The Japanese language version of the HPLP II appears to have sufficient validity and reliability for use by researchers who wish to describe the health-promoting components of lifestyle among the Japanese population and to explore differences and similarities in the health-promoting lifestyle of Japanese and American subjects or those of other ethnic groups. Further evaluations of measurement with different populations appears warranted. This instrument will enable researchers to investigate patterns and determinants of health-promoting lifestyle, as well as the effects of interventions to alter the lifestyle.

訂正日: 2009/02/17 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : 1) National center for health statistics. Advance report of final mortality statistics, 1990. Hyattsvill, Md: US Dept of health and human services; 1993. Monthly vital statistics report, Vol 41, No. 7.
2) Michael MJ and Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1990; 270: 2207-12.
4) Singer JE. The need to measure life-Style. International Review of Applied Phsychology 1982; 31: 303-15.
5) Ardell DB. The nature and implications of high level wellness, or why “normal health” is a rether sorry state of existence. Health Values: Achieving High Level Wellnessm 1979; 3: 17-24.
6) Wiley JA, Camacho TC. Life-Style and future health: Evidence from the Alameda County study, Preventive Medicine 1980; 9: 1-21.
7) Laffrey SC. Health promation: relevance for nuysing. Top clin. Nursing 1985; 7: 29-38.
8) Brubaker BH. Health promotion: A linguistic analysis. Advanced Nursing Science 1983; 5: 1-14.
9) Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice. Appleton & Lange, East Norwalk, Znd ed. 1987; 9-11.
10) Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting life-style profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Reseach 1987; 36: 76-81.
11) Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12) Walker SN, Volkan K, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. Health-promoting life style of older adults: Comparisons with young and middle-aged adults. Correlates and patterns. Advances in Nursing Science 1988; 11: 76-90.
13) Fleetwood J, Packa DR. Determinants of health-promoting behaviors in adults. J. Cardiovascular Nursing 1991; 5: 67-79.
14) Duffy ME. Daterminants of health-promoting lifestyles in older persons. Image, J. Of Nursing Scholarship 1993; 25: 23-28.
15) Oleckono WA, Lacconiere MJ. Risk taking behaviors and other correlates of seat belt use among university students. Public Health 1990; 104: 155-64.
16) Weitzel MH. A test of the health promotion model with blue collar workers. Nursing Research 1989; 38: 99-104.
17) Pender NJ, Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Frank-Stromberg MF. Predicting health-promoting lifestyles in the workplace. Nursing Research 1990; 39: 326-32.
18) Walker LO, Best MA. Well-being of mothers with infant children: A premimilary comparison of employed women and home-makers. Women and Health 1991; 17: 71-89.
19) Franker-Stromborg M, Pender NS, Walker SN, Sechrist KR. Determinants of health-promoting lifestyle in ambulatory cancer patients. Social Science & Medicine 1990; 31: 1159-68.
20) Ali NS. Bennett SJ. Postmenopausal women: Factors in osteoporosis preventive behaviors. J. Of Gerontological Nursing 1992; 18: 23-32.
21) Huang YH. Chiou CJ. Assessment of the health-promoting lifestyle profile on reliablity and validity. Kao-Hsiung Hsueh Ko Tsa Chih Kaohsiung J. Of medical Sciences 1996; 12: 529-37.
22) Chen MY, Liao JC, Liao JH, Chou CC. The preliminary study of health-promoting lifestyles of public health nurses. Nursing reserch (Nursings' Association of the Republic of China) 1994; 2: 41-51.
23) Waiker SN, Kerr MJ, Pender NJ. Sechrist KR. A spanish version of the health-promoting lifestyle profile. Nursing Research 1990; 38: 268-73.
24) SPSS Professional Statistics 6.1.

Right : 1) National center for health statistics. Advance report of final mortality statistics, 1990. Hyattsvill, Md: US Dept of health and human services; 1993. Monthly vital statistics report, Vol 41, No.7.
2) Michael MJ and Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1990; 270: 2207-12.
4) Singer JE. The need to measure life-Style. International Review of Applied Phsychology 1982; 31: 303-15.
5) Ardell DB. The nature and implications of high level wellness, or why “normal health” is a rether sorry state of existence. Health Values: Achieving High Level Wellnessm 1979; 3: 17-24.
6) Wiley JA, Camacho TC. Life-Style and future health: Evidence from the Alameda County study, Preventive Medicine 1980; 9: 1-21.
7) Laffrey SC. Health promation: relevance for nuysing. Top din. Nursing 1985; 7: 29-38.
8) Brubaker BH. Health promotion: A linguistic analysis. Advanced Nursing Science 1983; 5: 1-14.
9) Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice. Appleton & Lange, East Norwalk, Znd ed. 1987; 9-11.
10) Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The healthpromoting life-style profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Reseach 1987; 36: 76-81.
11) Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12) Walker SN, Volkan K, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. Health-promoting life style of older adults: Comparisons with young and middle-aged adults. Correlates and patterns. Advances in Nursing Science 1988; 11: 76-90.
13) Fleetwood J, Packa DR. Determinants of healthpromoting behaviors in adults. J. Cardiovascular Nursing 1991; 5: 67-79.
14) Duffy ME. Daterminants of health-promoting lifestyles in older persons. Image, J. Of Nursing Scholarship 1993; 25: 23-28.
15) Oleckono WA, Lacconiere MJ. Risk taking behaviors and other correlates of seat belt use among university students. Public Health 1990; 104: 155-64.
16) Weitzel MH. A test of the health promotion model with blue collar workers. Nursing Research 1989; 38: 99-104.
17) Pender NJ, Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Frank-Stromberg MF. Predicting health-promoting lifestyles in the workplace. Nursing Research 1990; 39: 326-32.
18) Walker LO, Best MA. Well-being of mothers with infant children: A premimilary comparison of employed women and home-makers. Women and Health 1991; 17: 71-89.
19) Franker-Stromborg M, Pender NS, Walker SN, Sechrist KR. Determinants of health-promoting lifestyle in ambulatory cancer patients. Social Science & Medicine 1990; 31: 1159-68.
20) Ali NS. Bennett SJ. Postmenopausal women: Factors in osteoporosis preventive behaviors. J. Of Gerontological Nursing 1992; 18: 23-32.
21) Huang YH. Chiou CJ. Assessment of the healthpromoting lifestyle profile on reliablity and validity. Kao-Hsiung Hsueh Ko Tsa Chih Kaohsiung J. Of medical Sciences 1996; 12: 529-37.
22) Chen MY, Liao JC, Liao JH, Chou CC. The preliminary study of health-promoting lifestyles of public health nurses. Nursing reserch (Nursings' Association of the Republic of China) 1994; 2: 41-51.
23) Walker SN, Kerr MJ, Pender NJ. Sechrist KR. Aspanish version of the health-promoting lifestyle profile. Nursing Research 1990; 38: 268-73.

訂正日: 2009/02/17 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: PDFファイル訂正内容: -

抄録

The development and initial psychometric evaluation of a Japanese version of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II) is described. The 52-item instrument was translated into Japaneseand was found to be culturally relevant and reliable in a pilot study. The Japanese version was then administered to adiverse but predominantly Japanese group of 337 subjects residing in northern Japan. The Japanese version of the HPLP II was evaluated using factor analysis and reliability measurement. Six factors similar to those isolated previously during psychometric assessment of the English language version were extracted. Those six dimensions comprise the HPLP II subscales of: 1. Health responsibility, 2. Spiritual growth, 3. Physical activity, 4. Interpersonal relations, 5. Nutrition, and 6. Stress management. The alpha reliability coefficient for the total scale was 0.94 and the 2-week retest reliability was 0.91; the alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.87. The Japanese language version of the HPLP II appears to have sufficient validity and reliability for use by researchers who wish to describe the health-promoting components of lifestyle among the Japanese population and to explore differences and similarities in the health-promoting lifestyle of Japanese and American subjects or those of other ethnic groups. Further evaluations of measurement with different populations appears warranted. This instrument will enable researchers to investigate patterns and determinants of health-promoting lifestyle, as well as the effects of interventions to alter the lifestyle.

責任著者(Corresponding author)

訂正情報

J-STAGEへの登録はこちら（無料）