医学物理
Online ISSN : 2186-9634
Print ISSN : 1345-5354
ISSN-L : 1345-5354
壁材の異なるファーマ形電離箱線量計による高エネルギーX線の基準点吸収線量の測定
藤崎 達也平岡 武大澤 敦中島 大横山 公一桑原 秋夫齋藤 秀敏都丸 禎三稲田 哲雄
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2004 年 24 巻 1 号 p. 13-20

詳細
抄録
The Japan Society of Medical Physics (JSMP) have published a new dosimetry protocol "JSMP-01" (standard dosimetry of absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy)which conforms to the recommendations of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA TRS-398) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM TG-51) protocols for the calibration of radiotherapy beams. Since the new protocol offers the physical data for the Famer-type ionization chambers of the various wall materials, the user can measure the absorbed dose at reference point (Dr) using most of the commercially available Famer-type ionization chambers.
In this paper, the six Famer-type ionization chambers of the various wall materials is examined for photon beam by two ways. To verify the JSMP-01 protocol as the first way, Dr was cross-measured based on the JSMP-01 protocol using a Farmer-type ionization chamber of the acrylic wall material which is called "JARP-chamber" and the Farmer-type ionization chambers of the various wall materials, and compared. To compare the basic data in previous and new protocols as the second way, Dr was measured based on the previous protocol (JSMP-86) and the JSMP-01 protocol using the Farmer-type ionization chambers of the various wall nj mmon exposure calibration factor forCoe teriaglasm. mDao-srea ycsa lm(cNuauldcsai)ectn iofgoo nr was each of the Farmer-type ionization chambers. Measurements was made with each ionization chamber for 6 and 10 MV photon beams in two facilities.
Dr were found to agree to that of JARP-chamber wit hin about ± 1% despite significant differences of ratio of calibration factor (k D, x) and beam quality conversion factor (kQ) for photon beams. The ratios JSMP-01/JSMP-86 of the reference dose were found to lie on between 0.999 and 1.004 for 6 MV and on between 0.999 and 1.005 for 10 MV depending upon the Farmer-type ionization chambers used. The largest discrepancies between the previous and new protocols arise from the use of different data of kDx x kQ and C2 for the absorbed dose conversion factors of each ionization chamber.
著者関連情報
© 一般社団法人 日本医学物理学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top