日本磁気共鳴医学会雑誌
Online ISSN : 2434-0499
Print ISSN : 0914-9457
第51回日本磁気共鳴医学会大会 大会長賞記録
MR Cholangiopancreatographyを想定した呼吸停止法が消化管蠕動に与える影響[大会長賞記録]
大塚 勇平坂村 志帆中村 智哉梶原 直村上 克己田城 孝雄
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス

2024 年 44 巻 3 号 p. 101-108

詳細
抄録

Objective/Background

 Previous reports have suggested that breath-hold (BH) three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) provides additional value with respiratory-gated 3D MRCP. Although these methods have been reported to suppress “respiratory artifacts,” the influence of gastrointestinal peristalsis around the target organs is not mentioned. On the other hand, the autonomic nervous system has been reported to affect gastrointestinal peristalsis. There are also reports that BH imaging influences venous blood flow through its involvement with the autonomic nervous system. We examined the effects of BH imaging on gastrointestinal peristalsis.

Methods

 Seven healthy volunteers provided informed consent for our study. Gastrointestinal peristalsis was measured using cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with two-dimensional (2D) FIESTA. Cine MRI data were analyzed using the normalized interframe difference method in MATLAB, focusing on the duodenum and gastric body. Three respiratory patterns—free breathing (FB) with assumed respiratory gating, BH at maximum inspiration (Insp-BH), and BH at maximum expiration (Exp-BH)—were employed. Hemodynamic changes resulting from BH methods were evaluated using 2D phase contrast, targeting the inferior vena cava (IVC). The blood flow signal (BFS) was examined for all phases of each respiratory pattern. Statistical analysis used one-way ANOVA.

Results

 Peristaltic variation in the duodenum showed no significant differences among FB (2.03±0.86), Exp-BH (1.32±0.63), and Insp-BH (1.20±0.91). In the gastric body, no significant differences were observed between FB and Exp-BH or between Exp-BH and Insp-BH. However, a significant difference emerged between FB and Insp-BH (p<0.05). Regarding BFS, significant differences in IVC were noted between Exp-BH and Insp-BH, as well as between FB and Insp-BH (both p<0.01). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found between FB and Exp-BH.

Conclusions

 Our study suggests that Insp-BH reduces venous blood flow and suppresses the influence of peristaltic variation.

著者関連情報
© 2024 一般社団法人日本磁気共鳴医学会

この記事はクリエイティブ・コモンズ [表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止 4.0 国際]ライセンスの下に提供されています。
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.ja
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top