日本オーラル・ヒストリー研究
Online ISSN : 2433-3026
Print ISSN : 1882-3033
当事者であることの利点と困難さ : 研究者として/当事者として(<特集2>オーラリティにおける当事者性/非当事者性をめぐって)
鈴木 隆雄
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2010 年 6 巻 p. 67-77

詳細
抄録

Recently, there are active discussions on "Tojisha" studies in Japan. "Tojisha" means "the person concerned." In this paper, I considered the development possibility of minority studies on "the person concerned" or "Tojisha" ethnographers among the minority. I surveyed some advantages and difficulties of being "Tojisha" ethnographers in the field. First, one of the advantages of the "Tojisha" ethnographers is that the "Tojisha" person belongs to the same culture and community, so he/she does not have to study the culture and community. Next, one of the difficulties of the "Tojisha" ethnographers in the field would be that they would be confused as fellow ethnographers. By just being in the same culture and community, they may empathize too much with each other. They empathize but may lack the objectivity, since they can see from the point of view of the same culture and community. These advantages and difficulties could be the cause of problems, because these two things tend to be advantages and difficulties that are likely to be inextricably linked by fact. Therefore, I will introduce "Autoethnography" as a writing method of the "Tojisha" ethnographers.

著者関連情報
© 2010 日本オーラル・ヒストリー学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top