当事者と<わたし>(<特集2>オーラリティにおける当事者性/非当事者性をめぐって)

抄録

In this paper, I considered why I have evaded the issue of the person concerned/non-concerned in "Academia" and suggested the alternative relationship beyond that issue. As long as regarding events and others as "the object of analysis," I kept out of them and could consider myself not involved in any matter derived from that issue. The stage where the person concerned/non-concerned becomes the issue is the scene, in which the relationship with the others appears while one puts oneself inside of the event at least. Mostly, it is the situation in which an experience one had faces another experience. However, it cannot be distinct between the person concerned and the person non-concerned in each case. Not all people who have experienced events are the person concerned, and one person alone cannot be determined to be the person concerned. Because the person concerned is not given and determined previously, the issue is not in the relationship between the person concerned and the person non-concerned, but in the relationship between "You" and "I" who are living along with the historical time and social situations.