日本補綴歯科学会雑誌
Online ISSN : 1883-177X
Print ISSN : 0389-5386
ISSN-L : 0389-5386
接着試験法に関する基礎的研究
西島 奉一新谷 明喜横塚 繁雄
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

1988 年 32 巻 1 号 p. 137-150

詳細
抄録
Four different types of methods for testing adhesives for binding to 18-8 stainless steel (SUS 304) were performed using two kinds of dental adhesives, Panavia EX (PE) and Superbond C & B (SB), and the coefficient of variation (CV%) of the values determined and the destructive mode were compared among the testing methods.
Furthermore, using the Type III method with high reproducibility that produced a lower coefficient of variation and surface destruction among the above testing methods, the effect of surface treatment on the bond strength was studied, and the following results were obtained.
1. When the bond strength was compared according to the coefficient of variation, it was low for both PE and SB when testing method Type III or IV was used, revealing that they produced little variation.
2. Evaluation of the effect of surface treatment using method Type III which induced surface destruction revealed that the bond strength of PE was increased by ca. 50% by sand-blast treatment or silane-coupling treatment, and that Sn-electro deposition had no effect.
3. There was no difference in the bond strength of SB due to sand-blasting or silanecoupling treatment as forms of surface treatment, but the strength was decreased by Sn-electro deposition.
著者関連情報
© 社団法人日本補綴歯科学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top