Differences in the Kinematic and Kinetic Characteristics between Successful and Failed Sit-to-stand Trials in Patients with Stroke

Abstract

Objects：Sit-to-stand (STS) interventions are frequently used as part of stroke rehabilitation. This study aimed to clarify the kinematic and kinetic characteristics of patients recovering from stroke, who have difficulties with STS movement.

Method：The participants included 26 stroke patients who struggled to complete the STS maneuver. Using a 3D motion analysis system, the kinematic and kinetic parameters during STS were retrospectively analyzed and compared between failed and successful trials. The kinematic parameters of the trunk and lower limbs were obtained within the seat-off phases, and the kinetic indices of the lower limbs were obtained from measurements taken before and after the seat-off phase. The weight-bearing ratio on the unaffected side was calculated from the vertical ground reaction forces.

Results：In the successful trials, analyses of the parameters revealed more forward tilting of the pelvic and thoracic regions, a further forward and downward shift of the center of mass, and larger hip and knee extension moments than those of the failed trials. However, there was no difference in the weight-bearing ratio on the non-paralyzed side.

Conclusion：This study revealed that the kinematic and kinetic properties of the STS maneuver differed between successful and failed trials among patients with stroke. The study therefore provides useful information for clinical evaluation and rehabilitation.