The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology
Online ISSN : 1882-7233
Print ISSN : 0387-1193
ISSN-L : 0387-1193
Present status of diagnosis of “adenoma ma1ignum” and our activity to improve itsinterobserver reproducibility
Hitoshi TSUDAYoshiki MIKAMITsunehisa KAKUFutoshi AKIYAMAYuko SASAJIMATadashi HASEGAWAYoshihiro OHISHITakahiro KASAMATSU
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2006 Volume 45 Issue 2 Pages 147-153

Details
Abstract

Objective: To determine the status of histopathological diagnosis of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA), i.e., adenoma malignum, and to see if replicable, clinically useful differential diagnosis is possible between MDA and lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH).
Study Design: Four gynecological pathologists independently diagnosed 52 cervical glandular proliferative lesions based on their own criteria. Based on common criteria, 7 gynecological pathologists diagnosed 44 cervical glandular lesions into LEGH, LEGH+adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), MDA, and common adenocarcinoma. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by κ statistics.
Results: In the first study, interobserver agreement was slight (κ=0.115), and 5-year survival of patients with MDA varied from 13% to 60% among observers. In the second study, interobserver agreement improved to be substantial (κ=0.618), and the level between invasive lesions (MDA and common adenocarcinoma) and noninvasive lesions (LEGH and LEGH + AIS) was almost perfect (κ=0.928). Five-year survival was 100% for noninvasive lesions and 54% for invasive lesions (p<0.01).
Conclusions: Replicable, clinically meaningful differential diagnosis was possible between LEGH, LEGH with AIS, and MDA. Expansion of criteria and their application to preoperative diagnosis could prove to be very useful.

Content from these authors
© The Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top