Two Ways for Sport Sociology to Develop into a Practical Study:

Free from Designer Beliefs and Focusing on Sequence or System

Abstract

　In the first half of this paper, we will focus on disabled sports, in particular, the wheelchair basketball competition, what kind of competition it is, and in what respect it is an event that guarantees “competitiveness”. It is pointed out that even professional groups such as IPC(International Paralympic Committee) may not be able to find out, and if you give guidance while paying attention to the possibilities and aesthetics of each competition, in each real competition I argued that we would have to start with the task of reassessing the value and significance of what has been achieved in (of course, this also applies to non-disabled sports). Specifically, paying attention to the idea of “classification”, “classification” in wheelchair basketball is “classification” to ensure fairness between teams. This style is different from the “classification” in other disabled sports, and wheelchair basketball has the value of “inclusiveness” that allows people with any level of disability to contribute to the team in a variety of situations. That can be a competition that can embody the above. Assessing these two points, you should be free from designist beliefs, understand what kind of value the actual competition is realizing, evaluate it, and give guidance that fits that evaluation. Insisted that there is.
　In the latter half, we will use Kashida et al. [2018]. The sports instructor often employs a ladder model for instructing. Not always. Guidance in the direction of reducing the load on the instructor is not always easy for the instructor to accept. In the first place, if you observe what kind of interactions the instructor is doing while using methods such as video ethnography, what is formed by the instructor as a sequential order Since it can be relatively easy to find out, I argued that I should make good use of the results, and these things.