2004 Volume 50 Issue 2 Pages 121-128
In this study, we compared three acid-catalyzed methods and three base-cata-lyzed methods for the methylester preparation of conjugated dienoic fatty acids and conju-gated trienoic fatty acids in food and biological samples. Among the six methods examined, the sodium methoxide/methanol (NaOCH3/MeOH) method and the tetramethylguanidine/ methanol (TMG/MeOH) method of niethylester preparation from tung oil were most efficient in preventing the artificial isomerization of α-eleostearic acid (α-ESA; 9c, 11t, 13t-18:3) to β-eleostearic acid (β-ESA; 9t, 11t, 13t-18:3) and for avoiding the artificial genera-tion of unknown byproducts. Hydrochloric acid/methanol (HCl/MeOH), sulfuric acid/meth-anol (H2SO4/MeOH) and AOCS (boron trifluoride/methanol (BF3/MeOH)) methods of methylester preparation from tung oil resulted in the breakdown of α-ESA due to their long reaction periods and high reaction temperatures. In addition, these three methods did not prevent the generation of β-ESA. For the methylester preparation of tung oil free fatty acids, the BF3/MeOH method (30min at room temperature) did not lead to artificial β-ESA forma-tion or byproducts, while the trimethylsilyldiazomethane (TMSN2CH3) method did form artifacts. For the methylation of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA, free fatty acid), the BF3/MeOH and TMSN2CH3 methods completely suppressed artificial isomerization of c, t-CLA and t, c-CLA to t, t-CLA. The results indicated that the BF3/MeOH method for free fatty acids is the best method for the methylester preparation of both conjugated dienoic and trienoic fatty acids with respect to preventing artificial isomerization and the formation of byprod-ucts. The BF3/MeOH method was applicable to both food and biological samples.
