Sangyo Igaku
Online ISSN : 1881-1302
Print ISSN : 0047-1879
ISSN-L : 0047-1879
EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATIONS AND TOXICOKINETIC ANALYSIS OF THE ABSORPTION AND EXCRETION OF 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE BY THE LUNG
Tatsuya HOBARAHaruo KOBAYSHIEiji HIGASHIHARASusumu IWAMOTOToshihiro KAWAMOTOTsunemi SAKAINobutaka TSUBOTA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1982 Volume 24 Issue 6 Pages 599-607

Details
Abstract

Of fifteen dogs each five of them inhaled 1, 1, 1-trichloroethane (1, 1, 1-TCE) at the levels of 700, 1500, and 2, 000 ppm respectively for one hour. Changes in 1, 1, 1-TCE concentrations in the expired air, arterial blood and venous blood of dogs were measured from the beginning of exposure until one hour after the end of exposure. The results obtained were as follows. 1. Cumulative uptakes of 1, 1, 1-TCE in one hour exposure were 27.3 mg/kg at 700ppm, 44.7 mg/kg at 1, 500 ppm and 71.2 mg/kg at 2, 000 ppm. 2. Excretion ratios of 1, 1, 1-TCE in hour after the exposure were 66-71% at all the three levels of exposure. 3. During the exposure, highly significant negative corrrelation was seen between arterial/venous blood concentration ratio and expired/inspired air concentration ratio. In the post-exposure period, highly significant positive correlations were seen between expired air concentration and venous or arterial blood concentration. 4. The mean ratio of the total absorption value to the total inspired value was 14% at all the three levels of exposure. 5. From these results, the authors examined the multiple regression equations with two independent variables x and z which are shown as follows. a) During the exposure period, Y1: Cumulative absorption solvent by the dog (mg/kg) X1: Time of exposure (min) Z1: Level of the solvent value in the ambient air (μg/ml) logY1=-0.526+0.622logX1+0.905logZ1 b) Post exposure period, Y2: Cumulative excreted solvent value by the dog (mg/kg) X2: Time after the end of exposure (min) Z2: Cumulative absorbed solvent value by the dog at the end of exposure (mg/kg) logY2=-2.300+0.609logX2+0.858logZ2 We assumed that both equations are very fit and signficant.

Content from these authors
© Japan Society for Occupational Health
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top